Uncategorized

The Covid-19 law has proven its worth.

The debates relating to the Covid-19 law, which is scheduled for a vote on November 28, crystallize around the health certificate introduced by the Federal Council to curb the pandemic.

Some see it as the discrimination so much that it could lead to violence, while others say that there are clear grounds for reviewing the Federal Council’s decision. that this instrument contributes & agrave ; to some extent; our recovery & agrave; more or less normal of our activities, while waiting for the immunity; collective.

This vote does not sum up the vote; this single document and its QR code because it is the text that induces a series of financial supports which benefit social groups that have not been received. or not enough support This amendment extends the economic aid law, which is critical in filling support gaps.

The law has been modified several times to better protect people and businesses. The latest modification took place in March 2021 and extended the economic crisis aid program, which expires in June 2021, until March 2022.

Thus, they extend the (cooperation law), which applies to companies that close temporarily or have encountered a significant downturn in the business, and provide financial assistance in the form of granting allowances for loss of earnings of the self-employed who have observed a drop in their number of staff. 30% of the company’s (before 40%) extension of benefits in case of reduction of working time and extension of unemployment benefits. 24 months.

Much of the economy needs these aids to recover. A crisis from which we are still recovering.

The Covid-19 Law is, let us remember, temporarily in force.

The extension of the obligation to produce a health certificate is valid until January 24, 2022, but the Federal Council may lift it sooner depending on the situation and the workload.

The chances of this hypothesis occurring will be greater if the vaccine continues to progress.

The references are wrong, this is incorrect combat evidence. Rejecting these provisions will not remove the measures put in place to prevent the spread of the virus. Do not confuse the mask with quarantine.

For the latter, it is forbidden to enter the country. As for the mask, it is considered a medical mask and must be worn in enclosed spaces.

The reason for this reversal is that, in colder areas, the dead leaves will often remain at the bottom, which will attract and push down the newly born leaves. This situation may occur with other grasses and plants as well.

A thoughtless protest vote ( covid-19)

I just added another word about the Covid-19 certificate: We have to admit that it makes it easier to move abroad and to Switzerland because it is internationally recognized.

It is therefore of great importance for tourist circles and the work for hire sector because they do not need a special visa. for the economy to take a new taste of pleasure travel, and for the Export Law to be thrown into the catacombs, and to refuse to recognize the certificates issued on March 19, in light of the legislative vacuum that applies till then.

Switzerland has imposed 56 international border controls, while the EU has imposed 29 border controls, since January 1, 2020. A protest vote of irresponsibility would create a number of economic disadvantages, as well as lead to uncertainties.

Responsible management of the virus as it is driving to & agrave; It would be extremely difficult to produce a summary document that would accurately reflect all aspects of the climate issues and how the new proposal would affect the economy. Security is a legal, possible consequence of a crisis.

Thus, a yes vote should be voted with conviction, regardless of the crisis.

About the author

Leave a Comment